Melancholy is a vice. It is a nebulous grieving that we
indulge in for something we cannot understand, let alone name. It is a mourning
that gives us pleasure, thus we continue to inhabit this diffuse pain, which
remains beyond the level of full cognition. Unlike real loss, where the thing
we loved and cared for is gone and our minds work on processing what cannot
come back to us and thus get over the pain, melancholy fixates on something
that gives us the pleasure of feeling sorrow. Mourning, then, is about the
world, melancholy is about the self. Freud, in an essay that like nearly all of
his writings is equal parts brilliant and loony, argues that melancholy is the
product of a loss that we have internalized as an identification between self
and object. In melancholy, argues Freud, the mechanism that keeps us attached
to a desired object, person, or ideal is let loose by some traumatic event and
rather than reconnecting us to another object it establishes a bond between the ego and the lost object. The loss of the thing is felt as a loss of
the self and grieving the thing allows us to contemplate something about
ourselves. Or to put it a different way, the grieving of melancholy is purely
self-indulgent.
Romantic love is the perfect material for melancholic
suffering. So much of that kind of affection is related to the way we cast
things in us unto other people and the ineffable shit that draws us to someone
else. The sentimentalism of romance has everything to do with the way we want
to imagine ourselves in connection to other people. For that reason songs that
resist the sentimental impulse while at the same time dealing with love and its
aftermath seem exceptional. For example, despite conclusions and memories there
is little melancholy in Interpol’s “Obstacle 1.” Beyond the harshness of the
music, the sense of the past is one of absolute endings: “It’s different now
that I’m poor and aging/I’ll never see this face again/You go stabbing yourself
in the neck.” Few feelings remain here beyond anger and resignation. There is
no romanticizing the past, internalizing the loss into a reason for joyous
sadness. Things will be different, “we can find new ways of living,” but what
was is over.
Graham Parson’s “A Song for You” splits the difference
between sorrow over loss and maudlin satisfaction. A phrase like “Oh my land is like a wild
goose” evokes the kind of atmospheric feeling that is melancholy’s natural
terrain. But there is an atonal, jagged quality to the song that interrupts any
easy sentimentalism. And when at the song’s ending its protagonist says “I
loved you every day and now I’m leaving,” the feeling there is too specific, too
pointed to be self-indulgent. What is there is hurt feelings, lost hopes. This
song may draw on the idiom of melancholy but it is ultimately about what’s left
over after a broken heart.
great as usual. kierkegaard's 'repetition' would have worked well with these songs, too. would love to see you write about him one day
ReplyDeleteI've gotten a few requests for songs before but never for philosophers! I'll think about it. Usually these things take a while to filter through, and, as you can imagine, I write mostly about people that have mattered to me in my own intellectual formation. Thanks for reading and for the compliment.
Delete